Monday, November 20, 2006

THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ALTERNATIVE

Part 1: Getting Started

Employment trends over the past 6 years have demonstrated an important new focus for people: you need to re-invent yourself often. Unfortunately, not many people will enjoy lifelong employment (with a defined set of skills) at one company as was the case in previous generations. Alvin Toffler said it best in 1970 when he predicted that people will need to be committed to learning, un-learning and re-learning. This means not being “married” to your college or vocational degree, but instead pursuing continuing education.

Paying for adult education is expensive. Once a person has a college degree, the opportunities to access government sponsored job retraining programs are limited. College degreed individuals can rarely tap training programs like ones for employees terminated from manufacturing or other “blue collar” jobs.

Once a person graduates from college, it is difficult to switch occupational focus and return for a new degree. For example job opportunities for teaching K-12: most potential candidates will need several courses in special education, refresher courses in specific course content and taking standardized tests to demonstrate proficiency in a subject area. For many, the price tag on new job preparation could run more than $10 thousand. The added insult is starting pay at less than $30 thousand per year, hardly enough to justify adding new debt.

Another factor is time. Most people already have significant debt and may be living with parents to pay loans at a faster rate. This may mean more than one full-time job or several part-time jobs to cobble together enough income to accelerate payment of the debt. It becomes difficult to spend the hours needed to attend classes and meet the obligations of coursework when so much time is dedicated to working.

The idea of becoming an entrepreneur is also daunting. If you are already short on funds because of debt, it is not likely you will get or want another loan to start a business. Logically, it is too big of a gamble to start a new venture with limited funds or deep debt.

There are some opportunities, such as freelance teaching or writing that will let you get started using your expertise and training on a limited budget. The Internet gives you potential to reach audiences with a minimum investment. Even if your web design experience is limited or non-existent, you can still build a web site with templates and pre-designed tools that give you a fresh start in your business. Hosting costs are also low enough to keep your new efforts affordable.

Your website is today’s new business card and résumé. You need to consider how your website will represent you and what will be the site’s focus. While it may be tempting to “make money” with advertising, it may compromise your image with potential clients.

Here’s an important note: don’t fall into the multi-level marketing (MLM) trap. There are many so-called opportunities that will entice you with the prospect of quickly making large sums of money. Most of these offers are scams (pyramid schemes) and the only person who earns the big bucks is the one selling you the entrance fee. If you have to pay to work for someone else and the only way you will make your money back is to lure new people to join as your “downline,” you need to stay away. As grandma would say: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

With respect to training, there are many sites that offer continuing education specific to your field of expertise. A search engine query will reveal hundreds of sites that you can research to get started. Once you have identified several that meet your needs, visit often or subscribe. And don’t forget about your local library; you’ll find many books on business, marketing and computer/software training that you can browse without buying.

You can also tap local colleges that offer small business courses or seminars and get good advice from organizations such as SCORE or the Small Business Administration. The real cost is time and you need to spend as much time as possible preparing for the next step. As the saying goes, failure to plan is a plan for failure.

Critical thinking involves the ability to write down abstract ideas so they can be reviewed and improved. That is the main reason why lending institutions want to see a business plan. If you cannot translate the mental picture of your idea(s) to a physical presence on paper, you need to keep thinking and learning. Colleges that offer small business programming can also help you formulate your business plan, usually at no cost.

Your business plan needs to include immediate, short-range and long-range objectives. If you can’t see your project three years from now and how your ideas will have matured, you are not ready so don’t invest. Over 9 out of 10 business ideas fail within two years, so having a plan that gets you through the most daunting early years is critical.

In Part 2 of this series, the personal make-up and dedication of good entrepreneurship will be discussed.

Tidbits

(1) From Kimberly Waltmire, a member of the USA Today 2006 All-USA Teacher Team, a recognition program for outstanding K-12 teachers:

“We often give children a blank piece of paper but we don’t give them the tools to write. Time and time again, their writing is dull and unimaginative and the kids are so stressed they can’t write. So I allow kids to experience things first and the writing comes last.”

(2) Employers don’t share company strategies is the conclusion from a study of strategy management professionals (“Making Strategy Execution a Competitive Advantage”). The study revealed that 95 percent of companies surveyed do not share their strategic plan with employees. That’s the bad news. The good news: when companies do have a strategic plan, 70 percent report they perform better than the competition. Only 20 percent of companies that do not have a strategic plan report out-performing their competition.

(3) We overlook stress and its physical impact on our bodies because of a slow rise in its intensity over time. The same can be said about inflation: it occurs slowly enough that it can be overlooked. (The exception is the dizzying rise of fuel costs, but that kind of jump in prices is usually not so evident.) Today, it costs $18,400 to buy goods and services (including healthcare, education, utilities and other necessities) that would have costs $10,000 in 1986. Has your income almost doubled over the same 20 years? Probably not; hence the result is the current explosion of credit card debt and the decrease in personal savings. In another 20 years, today’s $18,400 will cost about $30,000!

Visit www.3MinuteLearning.com

GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE

© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC

Monday, November 13, 2006

TOO MANY PROBLEM SOLVERS

Take Advantage of Opportunities

The US school system has done a great job in preparing curricula regarding problem solving. It is debatable if students are enjoying any great success with problem-solving curricula and it does offer great amounts of fodder for discussion.

One reason why there is so much emphasis on math and science is because they are easily measurable by standardized tests. Those fields of study lend themselves nicely to factual “right or wrong” test questions that can measure one student’s ability to remember over another. Once test scores are verified, a litany of statistics can be applied to support or defend educational programs.

As a county, we adore problem-solvers and reward those people with high paying jobs and in the case of the military, medals. After all, who doesn’t like the idea that the “good cowboy” is riding into town to deal with the “bad cowboys?” How often was GE’s Jack Welch placed on the pedestal as the company’s great problem-solver? George Patton is romanticized as the “kick butt” get it done general.

The issue is that education, K-16, is producing too many problem-solvers (coupled with technology taking over the role of problem solving) that leaves too many people out of work. Companies regularly use robots or computers during the manufacturing process to eliminate errors and create perfect outcomes at much higher levels than human workers could ever hope to perform. The result is better products but less highly educated people working.

Businesses have found that “leaner” payrolls eliminate middle management problem solvers; sadly these people are not missed. Too many problem solvers tend to cost business money, not make it. The few dollars saved by a more efficient process pales against the loss of customers flocking to a new product and company. A good example is the US auto industry.

This is not to say that business would do well to toss out all the problem solvers. There still needs to be a high degree of input because many problems arise every day. It is just that companies find that they don’t need as many problem solvers as the school systems are churning out on a yearly basis.

The real value for business comes when employees seek to exploit opportunities. They read about new trends that will increase sales or create new designs to attract new customers. The car company Toyota has often said that it is a design company that just happens to make cars.

So education needs to teach entrepreneurial thinking: finding opportunities and how to present them to decision-makers. This class would combine the elements of all school courses: art, science, English grammar, reading, math and so on. An entrepreneur combines the energy and thinking of many different disciplines to make their point.

The problem is not how you measure creative thinking but keeping it confined to the time efficiencies that schools demand. You can measure creative thinking using many traditional methods such as structuring proposals, networking, use of grammar and art and many other measurable factors. It is just not as easy to measure as a multiple choice test and certainly not as efficient. Lack of time in school is the enemy of creative thinking

Overall, isn’t this what business is asking for in their new recruits: to be able to think critically and creatively? Isn’t this the kind of education that makes people valuable and less likely to suffer the indignity of unemployment or working as an over-qualified worker at minimal wage? To prepare students for the future, schools need to take knowledge and show students how it applies to innovation.

Problem solvers abound in every walk of life. What is not as likely to be found is the person who uses good thinking to create opportunities and teach others how to capitalize. That in turn makes more profit for the company and more opportunities for employment.

Potpourri

1) According to American Demographics Magazine, the average US household spends almost $90 per day on goods and services. That translates to $32,850 per year in spending. It also means that the average household needs to earn about $30 per hour to spend at that level (factoring in taxes, insurance and capital spending such as appliances).

2) According to the “2006 Life After College” study, most college graduates stay at their first job for less than 2 years. During the first year, 36 percent report leaving and another 42 percent leave during the second year. About 5 percent haven’t worked since graduating. Newly hired teachers leave after 2 years at a rate of about 50 percent.

Visit www.3MinuteLearning.com

GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE

© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

WATCH YOUR DISTANCE

When Leading, Keep the Pack Close

As a bicycle rider, my strength was on the flat or slight decline in the topography. Sure, anyone is strong riding flat or downhill, but my body size made riding in those conditions exceptional. Other riders knew that when the road ahead was flat, it was time for me to take the lead so they could draft and gain greater speed.

When you take the lead, you tend to shift “down” to increase power and speed. A quick glance over the shoulder reveals a line forming to take advantage of the drafting opportunity. The bike speed increases from 16 miles per hour to over 25. It is fun!

This kind of teamwork benefits everyone. The speed is exhilarating and casual observers marvel at the speed the group is generating.

The problem can be the length of the time these “perfect” conditions exist. My strength allows me to continue endlessly for miles; the riders behind me, despite the “easier ride” start to fall back from fatigue. As the distance between me and the next rider lengthens, the draft benefit decreases and soon the group falls apart. If I don’t realize what is happening, I could easily be several hundred yards ahead.

Now this is not a story to create awe-struck kudos. It illustrates what happens when a leader’s vision is too far ahead of the pack. An idea that creates too much change or asks that people just “go along” will create a virtual distance between the leader and those looking for a new solution. This puts the leader too far out in front and little support from those in the rear. The military calls this “outrunning your supply lines.” It is not a situation that has a strong enough foundation to keep going.

As you move forward and try to keep your “pack” together, make sure you haven’t shifted down too fast. Build momentum by accomplishing smaller tasks successfully. Begin to delegate and involve people with greater shares of your vision so their confidence in the vision’s direction continues to grow. People like to stay in their comfort zone and if you don’t make the next level comfortable, they will tend to drift back.

This is really not that difficult for a leader to implement, Check and calibrate your approach and growth regularly to keep people from drifting. Allow others to take the lead; this may slow the project down somewhat but it allows everyone to “catch their breath.” In my example above, if the second and third riders were to take turns leading the line, the pace would slow to a comfortable level allowing everyone to stay together.

The objective in implementing your vision is not to see how fast you can accomplish the tasks or how outstanding you are by working “solo.” It is always going to be about how many people adopt the new strategy and feel successful.

Be a leader by knowing when to step out of the way. The highly successful baseball manager Sparky Anderson was asked during his Hall of Fame induction what his managing approach was in leading the “Big Red Machine” of the 1970’s. His answer: I stayed out their way and let them play.

Visit www.3MinuteLearning.com

GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE

© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC

Monday, October 30, 2006

OCTOBER MUSINGS

Perceptions

It is rare for subordinates to get a chance to formerly review their managers. Even though 92 percent of managers rate themselves as good or excellent, only 67 percent of their subordinates agree with the assessment. No manager ranked themselves as “poor”, 10 percent of their subordinates provided that assessment. (source: Hudson National Opinion survey of workers, 2006)

Many companies have tried 360 degree assessments to improve communication and productivity in the workplace. Evaluations tend to become popularity contests and do not always represent feedback that may improve employer-employee relations. Management at any level needs top improve its level of communication with employees. People in the workplace just want an opportunity to be heard.

Regular and informal conversations with employees will vastly improve relations and productivity without any of the expensive gadgets or fads that populate the workplace. The term used to be “work around management” or WAM and it is unfortunate that companies don’t use that simple technique on a daily basis.

Any company that wants to improve its productivity and ultimately its profitability needs to increase its “paying attention to people quotient.” Making the workplace meaningful will yield the kind of results management is seeking.

Wage Info Good News to Colleges

College administrators and recruiters love the kind of earning income reports that came out recently. Adults 18 and older with a bachelor’s degree earn an average of $51,154 in 2004. A high school diploma only earns the person $28,645 and non-high school grads only earn $19,169.

The greatest myth in education is that a college education leads to high paying jobs for all graduates. Using average income data, a college degree easily outpaces a high school graduate and a high school dropout. Yet the trend, measured since 1999, seems to show that the gap is closing.

In 1999, a bachelor’s degree earned over twice the amount of a high school graduate. Looking at the 2004 data, the gap is less than two times greater. Given the recent data that shows the average annual wage in the US is around $40,000, it seems that the gap between degrees has shrunk again.

Add to the supposed college wage advantage the average debt acquired by earning a bachelor’s degree, it could take up to 10 years for many college graduates to actually earn more than the high school graduate. For example, today’s newly hired teacher will most likely earn less than $35,000 in many school districts. After taxes and making loan payments, the difference will be much less than the customer service rep with a high school diploma.

There are some high paying jobs in the marketplace for college graduates, but not enough to justify the extreme emphasis on going to college. While nearly 70 percent of high school graduates try at least two years of college, only 45 percent of adults over 25 actually have a degree. And of those with a college degree, the average yearly income is influenced by the less than 1 percent that is earning millions of dollars per year as a CEO, entertaining or professional athlete.

Healthcare Crisis

There is a tremendous emphasis on healthcare with respect to those persons who do not have insurance. Universal healthcare is often discussed but will not become reality until the current crisis becomes critical.

The irony will be once universal healthcare is available is who will take of us? Retiring healthcare professionals will leave a tremendous void in communities. Just as “baby boomers” will be retiring in record numbers over the next 10 years, so too are people in the medical professions. Over 33 percent of today’s physicians are older than 55.

According to Arthur Garson, Jr, MD, Dean of the University of Virginia School of Medicine, healthcare providers are rapidly moving from providers to consumers. So while everyone may eventually get a ticket to the dance, very few of us will get a chance to hear the music.

Visit www.3MinuteLearning.com

GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE

© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC

Monday, October 23, 2006

MISTAKES

Have an Interview? Avoid these Mistakes

According to a report in USA Today (10/17/06), the most common job interview mistakes noticed by employers are:

(1) Little or no knowledge of the company (47%)

(2) Unprepared to discuss skills and experience (17%)

(3) Unprepared to discuss career plans and goals (9%)

(4) Limited enthusiasm (9%)

(5) Lack of eye contact (3%)

Considering that today’s youth will spend at least 15 to 21 years in school you would think that someone would have reviewed the essentials on how to prepare for a job interview. Plus, access to the Internet leaves little room for excuses of ignorance or the lack of preparedness.

Most likely, someone at sometime did go over the essentials of job interviewing. The student was asleep, absent or “zoned out” during the presentation. The problem is self-discipline and the attitude of entitlement.

If you have an interview scheduled, learn more about the company. Go to their website; if it is a public company, look them up at Hoovers.com; call the local chamber of commerce; or ask a couple of employees about the company. Just don’t go in empty handed.

One of the “hidden” benefits of learning more about the company is your ability to negotiate a better contract, wages or benefits. Also, through research you may discover that the company may not be right for you.

One of the current favorite interview strategies is to have you role play several different scenarios, including describing future goals and objectives. Run various scenarios through your mind to determine the best responses you can generate. Take a look at recruiting sites such as Monster.com to see what is typically asked during interviews and practice.

Finally, be enthusiastic and make good eye contact. These intangibles may be all that separate you from the “crowd” and a high paying job. No one is entitled to a job; you earn it.

Teacher’s Dead Man’s Chest?

Today, the US Department of Education announced that a new program is in place to reward teachers with cash bonuses when their students score high on standardized tests. Scandals: on your mark, get ready, set, go!

Instead of this absurd incentive program that if successful, will only prepare students to take standardized tests and will have little bearing on future success, why not increase the base salaries of new teachers? Currently, new teachers are entering their respective districts with pay that is $10 to $12 thousand below median wages in the US. These teachers are college graduates, have passed certification tests and are considered highly qualified yet are only making slightly more wages than a high school diploma salesperson.

Communities still pay teachers as though it is a woman’s job and a second income for families. The attitude that it is only a 9-month job somehow justifies that teachers deserve less. Is it any wonder that so many teachers quit after two years? Low pay and no respect certainly won’t make people feel very welcome.

So next year when the scandals start to be revealed, just remember how easy it could have been to avoid. Teach lifelong excellence and personal dedication over one-time test taking and pay teachers for the ultimate value they bring to our communities.

The Most Lucrative Big Business

If you have read these columns over the past several months, you would have learned about all the money colleges are earning through various means: credit card companies, alumni gift giving, tuition rate hikes, sports contracts and licensing, and investments and real estate deals. Next, add the contributions of the American taxpayer who will spend $30 billion this year on financial aid for college students.

Without financial aid, most high school students will stay at home. The average cost of four years of college is $49,000 at public schools and $116,000 at private schools. Since 1990, the average public costs for tuition, fees, room and board have more than doubled. For example in 1990, costs at private schools were $13,476; in 2006, $29,026. Public schools in 1990: $5074; in 2006: $12,127. (Data from USA Today, 10/17/06)

Visit www.3MinuteLearning.com

GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE

© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC