Tobacco Use Drops
The percentage of boys and girls ages 12 to 17 that used tobacco products is dropping. In 2002, the reported use was 12.3 and 13.6 percent for boys and girls respectively. By 2005 the use had dropped to 10.7 and 10.8 percent respectively.
Since the early 1970’s, smoking education programs have been in place in K-12 education. All the non-profit health organizations such as heart, lung and cancer have introduced games, booklets, videos and mascots to send the message to K-12 students that smoking is harmful and needs to be avoided. After nearly 35 years of effort, the programs seem to be working.
Or are they? The cost for a pack of cigarettes has increased dramatically, enforcement agencies have deterred small shop owners from selling to minors and society in general has shunned the habit with more laws banning public smoking. And, in the workplace, employment may hinge on answering the question about whether or not you smoke. Some companies have targeted employed smokers whenever there are terminations.
These messages may be stronger than education. Adults see smoking as a negative behavior even among the ones who smoke. This kind of talk around their children sends a message of disgust and that may be the turning point. Researchers know that children follow the lead of their parents. If they hear enough negative talk about smoking, health and social acceptance that may be the trigger point not to start.
Education about smoking now completes the adoption of non-smoking behavior by reinforcing what the child hears at home. As long as the program focuses on healthy alternatives to a smoking lifestyle that can be as satisfying, smoking among young people will be minimized but not totally eliminated.
To completely eradicate smoking among school students of all ages, schools need to influence the social circles of peer groups. Every school has cliques and they are part of the dominating social circles. The leadership in these larger circles needs to be influenced so they set the trend of not smoking. If you lose any of these social influencers, many more students will follow and the drop in smoking numbers may start to reverse.
Stop Anti-Drug Campaigns
Is there anyone who really believes that people who use drugs will be influenced by commercials showing “eggs in a frying pan?” Remember the crash and burn films in driver’s ed that were supposed to encourage safe driving? Behaviorists know that people use “cognitive dissonance” to justify their behaviors, even ones as simple as buying new clothes. In essence, we can talk ourselves into anything that we want to pursue.
The Government Accountability Office issued a report in August 2006, that reveals anti-drug campaigns are not working and should end. The campaign actually seems to be increasing drug use. The 2007 budget has requested $170 million to continue the commercials, a $20 million increase over this year’s budget. Why?
Here’s another scenario where the survival of bureaucracy is trying to trump the science of investigation. If independent research says “it’s not working,” then why continue along those same strategies? Why not investigate other ideas that may have an impact? When it comes to drug abuse and how to minimize its spread, there are many credible voices that need to be heard.
The “war on drugs” began in the 1970’s (a familiar theme?) generally has not deterred the use of drugs despite some instances of success. The harder to achieve (with more long-term results) solutions that would have a greater impact are too much “leg-work” for those in bureaucracy. These solutions call for stronger education at all grade levels, better housing and prospects for employment and raising the hopes of those that for generations have struggled. In general, give people a reason not to use drugs or to sell drugs as a way out of their environment.
Solving drug abuse at the social level is not as glamorous as tracking down and capturing drug lords but it is the long-term solution that makes sense. Cut off the demand and you will eliminate the supplier.
Hoopla Around Professional Models
Recently, the annual fashion shows were making their rounds across the globe introducing new styles. Young girls are influenced by these glamorous people. The result is to do whatever is necessary to keep thin. While a certain degree of thinness is healthy, purposely denying your body of nutrients during the “growing years” will result in long-term chronic illness such as heart disease and osteoporosis. Fortunately, this devotion to thinness appears to be short-term infatuation.
Professional models often wear a size 4; the size most often sold in retail is size 14. The average proportion of physical features for size 4 is 32-24-35. For size 14 the attributes are 38-31-42. If young girls can make it through the formative years with minimal bodily damage, it appears they will “catch up” as they get older.
Physical fitness needs to be stressed more as a healthy way of creating thinness not only during the teen years but for life. As with all behavioral issues, quality alternatives need to be introduced in order to replace the negative choice.
GROWTH <> LEADERSHIP <> EXCELLENCE
© 2006 3 Minute Learning LLC
No comments:
Post a Comment